Pat’s Polemics

by Pat Barrett

Tue, 26 Jan 2010: The Opposition to Communicative Teaching of FL

Category: Teaching
by: Pat Barrett
Add to Technorati Favorites

Comments

Brian Barabe wrote (Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:20):

It really is lamentable that these old curmudgeons just don't get it. The vision you and others have shared, of two to three years of communicative language instruction, in which great amounts of language are heard and read, before the introduction of some language analysis/rule explanation while continuing communicative instruction, is a very efficient way to produce people who can actually use a language.

If we taught driver's ed the way these curmudgeons teach languages, we'd get a lot of people killed--many more than the 40,000 a year in the US I recently heard of.

Brian Barabe wrote (Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:34):

For those interested in this topic, Ben Slavic happened to blog on nearly the same complaint the same day. You can read it under the title "Response to Grant" at http://www.benslavic.com/bl... Ben states what should be happening in language classrooms in terms of communicative language teaching.

Pat Barrett wrote (Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:35):

Just an aside -
That figure of 40,000 suggests we're doing something right b/c I remember hearing that same figure when I was about 8 y.o., so 60 years ago (I remember b/c when I heard it on the radio, I thought they picked people out to die and wondered if my mother would be one)

tom mccarthy wrote (Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:40):

Just a off the cuff thought...
What if we changed out the word "grammar" for some politically charged term?

E.g: 'Entitlements', or '[Linguistic]communism'

"Kids just don't understand the fundamentals of communism any more. I'm going to bury them in worksheets."

"How will they ever succeed if they don't learn proper communism?"

Wes Groleau wrote (Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:24):

"If we taught driver's ed the way these curmudgeons teach languages, we'd get a lot of people killed--many more than the 40,000 a year in the US I recently heard of."

I'm not sure that's a good analogy for language teaching.

First, in most states, one is required first to pass a test on legal and practical issues in driving, _before_ getting behind the wheel and practicing.

Second, not being taught certain things is the reason people driving 80 mi/hr in light snow collide with people driving ten. Or lock the brakes and slide off the road instead of using them effectively.

Paul Widergren wrote (Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:31):

To quote Paul García:
First, may I add a reference on the matter of CLT and drills that I
have used with my methods students: Wong, W. & VanPatten, B. (2003).
The Evidence is IN: Drills are OUT. Foreign Language Annals, 36,
403-423.

Die Botschaft höre ich wohl,
allein mir fehlt die Glaube.

Add Comment

Your comment (Members, please log in first):







Sidebar

Pat’s Polemics Categories
All
African Diaspora
Basics
Book Club
Culture
Daily lesson log
definitions
Diet
Excerpts from our history of fl teaching
General
Kid Talk
Kids These Days
Linguistics, grammar & language chan
Minority students
Pat’s worldview
Personal
Personal language learning
politics
Ramblings
Spanish Grammar points
Teaching
teaching & learning
Tidbits from the history of English
Two Views of Language
What Am I Reading?
Word usage
Site Outline
Language & Learning RSS
   Ideas & Opinions RSS
      Pat Barrett RSS
      Quentin Grady RSS
      Richard Russell RSS
      Wes Groleau RSS
      Guests RSS
   Tools & Resources
      Spanish Video Worksheets
      Links

Web Ideas.Lang-Learn.us
Navigation
Previous Item
Next Item
Today
Archives
Login
 
Content copyright © 2006-2010 individual author(s).  All rights reserved.  Hosted by Lang-Learn.us.